The Worst Supervillain Performances In Comic Book Movies
- Photo:
- 20th Century Fox
- X-Men Origins: Wolverine
The Merc with a Mouth is notoriously hard to pin down - sometimes he's working with the forces of good, and other times he has no problem wrecking heroes. In X-Men Origins: Wolverine, he's activated by Stryker and becomes a villain Wolverine has to fight (seriously, thank God for the 2016 film Deadpool finally giving audiences a good version of the epic character - they deserved it after this abomination).
The X-Men Origins filmmakers wanted to go for a more “realistic” take on Deadpool by manipulating his body to convey similarities with his comic costume. This was a bad idea. First of all, they used skin to cover his mouth as a way mimicking the lack of a mouth hole on his costume. They also gave him adamantium arm blades to emulate his katanas, and optic blasts that imitated the signature look of his mask. The whole thing was a sh*t show, and sparked a lot of disappointment from fans. On top of that, these awful "costume" choices made it nearly impossible for Scott Adkins to really inhabit the role - he didn't even have a mouth to speak with. Talk about being set up to fail.
Was this awful?- Photo:
- Photo:
- Spider-Man 3
- Sony Pictures
The release of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man in 2002 was a momentous occasion as viewers finally got to see the wall crawler making his long-awaited big screen debut. Many fans started eagerly counting down the days until Spider-Man would face off against his arch nemesis, Venom.
And then, five years later, fans got Topher Grace, the guy from That ‘70s Show. The casting was beyond questionable because Grace was a far cry from being physically imposing, a signature trait of Venom. And even though Grace went through heavy weight training to prepare for his role, the transition was from a naturally skinny guy into an average built guy. In terms of character, this version of Eddie Brock came off more like an overdramatic whiner who even stopped by a church to ask God to put a hit out on Peter Parker. Remember that? That happened. Grace's timid acting didn't help add any menace to the character, and the performance overall was pretty terrible. In the end, this Venom was underwhelming and jarringly disappointing.
Was this awful?- Photo:
Sarsgaard’s performance as Hector Hammond in Green Lantern told the story of one man’s journey to become a brilliant, cosmic, screaming pimple. It was so painful to watch, everyone was ecstatic when Parallax finally put him out of his - and the audience's - misery. If he wasn't being extremely creepy, he was yelling. And that was all there was to it.
Was this awful?Quick: what do you think of when you hear the phrase "actor Paul Giamatti?" Affable? Schlubby? Endearing? Chances are, you probably don't think "very intimidating, physically." Yet that's exactly what Giamatti expected audiences to buy in 2014's The Amazing Spider-Man 2. In a film irresponsibly overstuffed with villains, Giamatti tries to stand out by putting on the worst Russian accent known to man and moving like a constipated dumpling.
He's so unthreatening and forgettable, even the classic move of getting a barbed wire head tattoo can't elevate him above of the level of "wait, was he in that movie? I think he might have been in the first one."
Was this awful?- Photo:
- 20th Century Fox
- Fantastic Four
It's frustrating to see one of the most badass supervillains of the Marvel Universe get so poorly portrayed time and time again. The Fantastic Four reboot from 2015 is best remembered as a movie that did a great job in taking too much time focusing on the things that didn’t matter, while taking too little to explore the things that did.
There was absolutely no exploration of Dr. Doom's time spent on Planet Zero prior to the moment when he received powers from his space suit. And the character's motivations throughout the film were murky at best. Toby Kebbell sported some charisma in his role as Doom, but the combination of horrible writing and direction hindered Kebbell’s performance. Dr. Doom ended up as a weak, plot-driven obstacle that the heroes overcame in less than half an hour. Terrible CGI, and a cheesy hood and cape didn't help, either.
Was this awful?- Photo:
Fans were, to put it lightly, doubtful about the idea of casting Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. In the end, those doubts were justified.
Eisenberg’s portrayal of Lex was all over the place. It seemed like he was suffering a psychosomatic identity crisis on set. His performance has been likened to being a cross between the Joker and just Eisenberg being himself. It was also hard to believe that this portrayal was the same brilliant, calculating mastermind that Luthor is renowned for in the comics. He left a piss-filled jar in the Senate, set up his super secret server room next to his kitchen (easily breached via RF switch), and just fidgeted and stuttered all about.
Was this awful?